Barsalou, L.W. (1985). Ideas, Central Tendency, an

Amin, T.G. (2001). A cognitive linguistics approach to the layperson’s understanding of thermal phenomena. In Cienki, A., Luka, B.J., and Smith, M.B. (Eds.)

Conceptual and Discourse Factors in Linguistic Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI

Publictions.

Anderson, J.R. and Thompson, R. (19). Use of analogy in a production system architecture. In S. Vosniadu & A. Ortony (Eds.) Similarity and Analogical

Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Angier, N. (2004). Some blend in, others dazzle: The mysteries of animal colors. In The New York Times. July 20, 2004: Science Tuesday.

Atkins, L.J., Martinez, G., Seeley, L.H., and Seidler G.T. (2001). An experimental study of bond-orientational order in random dense packings of spheres. Proceedings

from the 2001 American Physical Society Meeting.

Barsalou, L.W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3), 211-227. Barsalou, L.W. (1985). Ideas, Central Tendency, and Frequency of Instantiation as Determinants of Graded Structures in Categories. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 629-654.

Barsalou, L.W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101-140). Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Barsalou, L.W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (in press). Situating abstract concepts. In D.

Pecher and R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and

action in memory, language, and thought. New York: Cambridge University

Press.

Berlin, B. and Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution.

Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bernard, C. (1858/2002) Leçons sur la physiologie et la pathologie du système nerveux, 2 vols. (Paris, 1858) 1: 3. Translated by Otis, L. (2002).

Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Bowdle, B.F., and Gentner, D. The Career of Metaphor. Psychological Review. In press.

Bowdle, B.F., and Gentner, D. (1999). Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Conference of the

Cognitive Science Society, 90-95.

Boyd, R.N. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In G. Sayre-McCord (Ed.), Essays on Moral Realism (pp. 181 – 228). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Brookes, D.T. (2004). Do we say what we mean? Misclassification of physics concepts and students’ difficulties. 129th Meeting of the American Association of Physics

Teachers. Sacramento, CA. AAPT Announcer33(2).

136Brookes, D.T. (2003). Linguistics and the epistemology of physics. 127th Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers: Madison, WI. AAPT Announcer

32(2).

Brown, R. (1958). Words and Things. New York, NY: Free Press.

Brown, J.S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (19). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher; v18 n1, pp. 32-42.

Burr, Chandler. (2003). The Emperor of Scent. New York, NY: Random House. Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M. and Green, B. (1981). Naive beliefs in sophisticated subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9:117-123. Carver, E.L., Price, K.L., and Wilken, D.M. (2000). Increasing Student Ability To Transfer Knowledge through the Use of Multiple Intelligences.

Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., and Vaid, J. (Eds.) Creative Thought: An Investigation of

Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. P 208-234

Chi M T H, Feltovich P J & Glaser R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science (5):121-152. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

30(10), 1241-1257.

d’Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cultural anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, David E. (1992). Using Examples and Analogies to Remediate Misconceptions in Physics: Factors Influencing Conceptual Change

Science Teaching, v29 n1: 17-34.

Davidson, D. (1967). Causal relations. Journal of Philosophy, (21), 691–703. diSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225

Doran, R.L. (1972). Misconceptions of selected science concepts held by elementary school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9:127-137.

Dubois-Reymond, E. (1868). On the time required for the transmission of volition and sensation through the nerves. In H.B. Jones (Ed.) Croonian Lectures on Matter

and Force, London: Churchill.

Dunbar, K. (2001). The Analogical Paradox. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak and B. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 313-334).

Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Dunbar, K. (2000). What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition. In Crowley, K., Schunn, C.D., & Okada, T. (Eds.) Designing for Science:

Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. LEA.

Hillsdale:NJ.

Edwards, B. (19). Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain: A Course in Enhancing Creativity and Artistic Confidence. Los Angeles, CA: JP Tarcher. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K., and Gentner, D. (1986). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.

137Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1994). From the electronic text,

http://markturner.org/csdl.rtf. From a handout at CSDL 1994, SanDiego, CA. Fearing, F. An Examination of the Conceptions of Benjamin Whorf. In H Hoijer, (ed.) Language in Culture: Conference on the Interrelations of Language and Other

Aspects of Culture. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1954.

Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fillmore, C. (1982). Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R.J. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds.). Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related

Topics. Chichester, England: Wiley.

Fromm, Erich. (1957). The Forgotten Language; an Introduction to the Understanding of Dreams, Fairy Tales, and Myths. New York, Grove Press.

Galison, P.L. (2003). Einstein's Clocks, Poincare's Maps: Empires of Time. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

Gallas, K. (1995). Talking Their Way into Science: Hearing Children's Questions and Theories, Responding With Curricula. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Gallwey, W.T. (1997). The Inner Game of Tennis. New York: Random House. Gaume, B., Duvignau, K., Gasquet, O., and Gineste, M. (2002). Forms of meaning, meanings of form. Journal of Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14. pp 61-74. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-17.

Gentner, D. (19). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadu & A.

Ortony (Eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gentner, D. and Forbus, D.R. (1991). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval.

Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.

Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 99-129).

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. England: Cambridge

University Press.

Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and Transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393-408. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.

American Psychologist (52:1), 45-56.

Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., and Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive

Psychology 25:524-575.

Gibbs, R.W. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review 99:3. 572-577.

Gibbs, R.W. and Matlock, T. (1999). Psycholinguistics and mental representations.

Cognitive Linugistics, 10(3), 263-269.

Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

138Gick, M.L., and Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.

Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.

Glucksberg, S., Manfredi, D.A., and McGlone, M.S. (1997). Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories. In Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., and Vaid, J.

(Eds.) Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and

Processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 327-350 Glucksberg, S., and Keysar, B., (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3-18.

Goodman, N. (1972). Seven strictures on similarity. In N. Goodman (ed.) Problems and Projects. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.

Griffiths, Alan K.; Preston, Kirk R. (1992). Grade-12 Students' Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v29 n6: 611-28.

Hage, P., and Miller, W.R. (1976). Eagle = bird: A note on the structure and evolution of Shoshoni. Ethnoornithological Nomenclature. American Ethnologist 3: 481-48 Hammer, D. (2004). The Variability of Student Reasoning, Lecture 3: Manifold Cognitive Resources. To be published in The Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi

Summer School in Physics, Course CLVI. Italian Physical Society.

Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R.E., and Redish, E.F. (2004). Resources, Framing and Transfer. Not for citation or distribution. Oops.

Hesse, M.B. (1966) Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Hobbes, T. (1651/1999). Leviathan. From the electronic text,

http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rbear/hobbes/leviathan.html. Eugene, OR, The

University of Oregon.

Hofstadter, D. (2004). http://www.cogs.indiana.edu/people/homepages/hofstadter.html Hofstadter, D. (2003). Analogy as the Central Motor of Discovery in Physics.

Presentation at The Ohio State University. Personal video-tape of the talk from

the OSU Physics Department.

Hofstadter, D. (2001). Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K.J., and Kokinov, B.N. (Eds.) The Analogical Mind, p. 499-538.

Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hofstadter, D., and the Fluid Analogies Research Group. (1995). Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of

Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Hofstadter, D., and Mitchell, M. (1994). The CopyCat project: A model of mental fluidity and analogy-making. In K.J. Holyoak and J.A.Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and nural computation theory, vol. 2, Analogical Connections (p.

31-112). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Holyoak, K. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 19, pp 59-87). New York: Academic Press.

139Holyoak, K., Gentner, D., and Kokinov, B. (2001). Introduction: The place of analogy in cognition. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K., and Kokinov, B. (Eds.) The

Analogical Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Holyoak, K.J. and Thagard, P. (19). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction.

Cognitive Science 13, 295-355.

Holyoak, K.J. and Thagard, P. (19). A computational model of analogical problem solving. In S. Vosniadu & A. Ortony (Eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, M.G. and Magdaly, .G. (1979). Some cognitive aspects of figurative language: Association and metaphor. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8, pp 249-265. Jung, C.G. (1969). Man and His Symbols. New York: Doubleday.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kepler, J. (1596). Mysteriumcosmographicum.

Keysar, B, and Glucksberg, S. (1992). Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today 13:4. 633-658.

Kittay, E.F. (1987). Metaphor. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Kittay, E.F. (1997). Of “men” and metaphors: Shakespeare, embodiment, and filing cabinets. In Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., and Vaid, J. (Eds.) Creative Thought: An

Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington, DC:

American Psychological Association.

Kittler, F. (1990). Discourse Networks. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Koestler, A. (19). The act of creation. New York: Dell.

Kolodner, J.L. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.

Kosterlitz,J.M. and Thouless,D.J.(1973). Ordering, metastability and phase transition in two-dimensional systems. Journal of Physics C 6 p. 1181-1203.

Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G, and Nunez, R. (2001). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York: Basic Books.

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.

Cambridge University Press.

Lemke, J.L. (1997). Cognition, context and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D.

Kirshner (Ed.) Situated cognition theory: Social, neurological, and semiotic

perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lenoir, T. (1993). The eye as mathematician: clinical practice, instrumentation and Helmholtz’s construction of an empiricist theory of vision. In D. Cahan (Ed.)

140Herman von Helmholtz and the Foundations of 19th Century Science. Berkeley,

CA: University of California Pres.

Lewis, M. (2003). Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. New York: W.W.

Landon and Company.

Locke, J. ([1686]1959). An essay concerning human understanding. A. C. Fraser (Ed.) New York: Dover.

Louca, L. (2004). Case studies of fifth-grade student modeling in science through programming: Comparison of modeling practices and conversations (Doctoral

dissertation, University of Maryland, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International (UMI No. 31231919).

Lulis, E., Evens, M., and Michael, J. (2004). How human tutors employ analogy to facilitate understanding. 2004 Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Markman, A. B., and Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology 25:431-467.

Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.

May, D.B., Hammer, D., and Roy, P. (2004). Children’s analogical reasoning in a 3rd grade science discussion. In press.

Medin, D.L, and Wattenmaker, W.D. (1987). Category cohesiveness, theories, and cognitive archeology. In U. Neisser (Ed.) Concepts and Conceptual

Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, G.A. (1979). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mitchell, M. (1990). Copycat: A computer model of high-level perception and conceptual slippage in analogy making. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,

Michigan.

Murphy, G.L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Murphy, G.L., and Medin, D.L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence.

Psychological Review, 92, 2-316.

Namy, L.L., and Gentner, D. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories.

Cognitive Development, 14, 487-513.

NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1999). A Teacher's Guide with Activities in Science, Mathematics, and Technology, Grades 5-12.

http://spacelink.nasa.gov/Instructional.Materials/Curriculum.Support/Physical.Sci ence/Educator.Guides.and.Activities/Microgravity.Teacher.Guide/.index.html NRC: National Research Council. (1998). National Science Education Standards.

Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC: National Research Council. (2002). Scientific Research in Education. 2002 Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research Richard J. Shavelson and Lisa Towne, Editors. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Neisser, U. (1987). Introduction: The ecological and intellectual bases of categorization.

In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development. New York, NY:

Cambridge University Press.

141

Nersessian, N. J. (1985). Faraday's field concept. In Gooding, D. & James, F. A. J. L (eds.) Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday,

1791-1867. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, England. 377--406.

Nersessian, N. J. (2002). Maxwell and "the Method of Physical Analogy": Model-based reasoning, generic abstraction, and conceptual change. In: Essays in the History

and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics, D. Malament, ed. 129--166. Lasalle, Il: Open Court

Newport, E.L., and Bellugi, U. (1978). Linguistic expression of category levels in a visual-gestural language: A flower is a flower is a flower. In Cognition and

Categorization, E. Rosch and BB Lloyd (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nietzsche, F. (1873/1977). On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense. In W. Kaufman (Ed.) The Portable Nietzsche. New York: Viking Portable Library.

Novick, L.R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 510-520. Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor and Thought. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, G.B. (1996). Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin, TX: The University of Texas Press.

Pittman, K.M. (1999). Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 1-22.

Postman, N. (1992). Conscientious Objections: Stirring Up Trouble About Language, Technology and Education. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Redish, E.F. (J.) (2003). A theoretical framework for physics education research: modeling student thinking. International school of physics “enrico fermi”course

clvi varenna, ital july 15-25 2003

Richards, I. (1936) The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press. Richland, L.E., Holyoak, K.J., and Stigler, J.W. (2004). Analogy use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 37 – 60.

Rips, L.J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 665-685.

Rosch, E. (Heider). (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350. Rosch, E.H. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd, eds.

Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

27-48.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.Y., Johnson, D.M. and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology (8) 382-439.

Ross, A. (2004). Bjork’s Saga. The New Yorker. August 8, 2004.

DE Rumelhart, “Schemata: The building blocks of cognition,” In JT Gurthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and Teaching: Research reviews. International reading

association, Inc. 3-27 (1981).

Scharmer, C.O. (1999). Primary knowing: When perception happens from the whole field, interview with Professor Eleanor Rosch. Dialog on Leadership [Online

interviews]. Retrieved March 13, 2004, from the world wide web site

http://www.dialogonleadership.org/interviewRosch.html

142Scott, C. & Schactman, M. (2004). Patient Family Guide Heart Surgery. From the online text: http://www.lij.edu/lijh/cardiothoracic_surgery/heart_surgery.html. Shapin, S. & Shaffer, S. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Shen, Y. (1992). Metaphor and categories. Poetics Today, 13(4), 771-794.

Shen, Y. (1999). Principles of metaphor interpretation and the notion of “domain”: A proposal for a hybrid model. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1631–1653

Sloep, P.B. (1997). The Metaphorical Transfer of Models published as part of the chapter “The Whys and Hows of Interdisciplinarity.” In P. Weingart et al. (eds)

Human by Nature; Between Biology and the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, London, pp 103-150.

Taber, K.S. (2000). Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4) 399-417.

Thayer, E.L and Polacco, P. (1997) Casey at the Bat: A ballad of the republic, sung in the year 1888. New York: Putnam Publishing Group.

Trager, G.L. (1936). “Cottonwood” = “Tree:” A southwestern linguistic trait.

International Journal of American Linguistics, 9, 177-188.

Tyson, L. (1999). Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. New York and London: Garland Publishing Inc.

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352. VanLehn, K. (1998). Analogy events: How examples are used during problem solving.

Cognitive Science, 22(3), 347-388.

Vosniadu, S. and Ortony, A. (19). Similary and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In S. Vosniadu & A. Ortony (Eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.

143