辩论赛是一门艺术,是一种融口才、逻辑、风度、幽默、表演为一体的竞技项目,下面是小编搜集整理的英语辩论赛辩论稿,欢迎阅读。更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目!
Goodevening,Ladiesandgentlemen.
Accordingtothelaw,everysingleindividualisbornwiththerighttokeepliving.Sincedeathisjustapartoflife,tosuggestthatitisarightistograntthatitisafreedomtodecidewhenandwheretogiveupthiskindofright.Inamannerofspeaking,itisaman’srighttocommitsuicide.
Again,wecanfindintheOXFordAdvancedLearner’sEnglish-Chinesedictionarytheexplanationof“suicide”----theactofkillingoneselfintentionally----whichindicatesthatsuicideissimplyalibertarianmovementforhumanfreedomandtherightofmakingchoices.Itisthelaw’sdutytoprotecthuman’sfreedomandtherightofmakingchoices.
Whileitiswithoutdoubtthatsuicide,inreality,ishuman’sright,theremainargumentremain:
1,Maybesomepeoplewillsaythattheprimarypurposeofhumanbeingistolive,sosuicideisinhumaneandtotallyagainstthestandardofethic;
2,Suicideiscriminaloffensebecauseitinvolvesthekillingofaperson;
3,Thepeoplewhocommitssuicideisirrespondsabletothosewholovehim,evenifitisaphysicalandmentalrealsetohimself.
However,anevidencetosustainthefirstargumentisdifficulttoobtain.ItiscommonsensetonotethatModernmedicinehasitsownlimitationandcannotcurealltheexistingdiseases.InspiteoftheextraordinaryprogressmadeinModernmedicine,problemsremainintermsofguaranteeingthatallthepainsduetoillnesscanbereducedtoatolerantlevel.Asaresultofthis,atleastinthenearfuture,theremustbesomeillnesseswhichcannotbetreated,somepainswhichareuncontrollable,somepeoplewhoareterminallyill.Maybetheprimarypurposeofanordinaryandhealthyhumanbeingistolive,butwhatifthepersonwearetalkingaboutisaterminallyillpatientwhoseremainingtimeisnomorethanaseriesofsuffering.Neitherthelawnormedicalethicsrequires“everythingbedone”tokeepapersonalive.However,insistnece,againstthepatient’swishes,thatdeathbepostponedbyeverymeansavailableiscontrarytolawandpractice.Itwouldalsobecruelandinhumane.Therecomesatimewhencontinuedattemptstocurearenotcompassionate,wiseormedicallysound.That’swhereonlyeuthanasiacanbeofuse.Voluntaryeuthanasia,whichisanotherformofsuicide,ishuman,becauseitbringsmentalandphysicalreleasetothepatientandhisfamilyandhelpstoputanultimateendtothetormentofatermnallyillpatientbyhasteninghisdeathwhenhehasnoprospectofrecovering.Extendinganincurablysickpatient’slifemeansthesameasaggravatingthepain.Itisunnecessorytomaintainlifeartificiallybeyondthepointwhenpeoplewillneverregainconsciousness.Becauseeffortshouldnotbemadetoperpetuatewhathasbecomeameanlessexistence.
Othersmayarguethat“suicideiscriminaloffensebecauseitinvolvesthekillingofaperson”.Indeed,killinganotherpersonisakindofseriouscriminaloffensewhichwecall“murder”.However,whatwearetalkigaboutis“suicide”,not“murder”.Dotheyrealisethereisabigdifferencebetweenthelivesofourownandthelivesofotherpeople?Sinceitisourownlife,wehavetherighttodecideinwhatwaythelifemeetsitsend.Ifnot,whatisthedifferencegonnabe?Forinstance,youareguityofkeepingotherpeople’spossessionwithoutpermition.Becauseyouarestealingthethingswhichdonotbelongtoyou.Butwhenitcomestoyourownpossession,thatitistosay,whenyoukeepyourownpossessionorevenuseitinawaythatwillprobablydestroyit,noonewouldconsideryouasguity.So,Sustainingtheideaof“suicideiscriminaloffense”isasridiculousassayingthatapersonisguityofusinghisownpossessioninadestructiveway.Inthecaseofsuicide,thereisnovictims,letalonetheso-calledcriminaloffense.
Withregardtothelastargument----”thepeoplewhocommitsuicide,evenifitisaphysicalandmentalrealsetohimself,isirresponsabletothepeoplewhoreallylovehim”----theargumentitself,ironicallyisinsomesensetoabmitthatsuicideisaphysicalandmentalrealse.Butwhattheyfailtorealiseisthatthekindofreleaseisnotjusttotheonewhocommitsuicide,butalsotohisfamily.Itisaterminallysickpatient’srightaswellasdutytoputanutimateendtothetormentofhimselfandhisfamily.Becauseheisthereasonofallthesuffering.Thosewhochoosesuicideareaclassofpeoplewhoseremainingtimeisnothingbutsimplysuffering,aclassofpeoplewhochoosedeathasanultimateescapefromtheeternaltorturetheyaredestinedto,aclassofpeoplewhoneedcompassionandunderstandingfromtheirrelativesandthesociety,ratherthanmeanlesslyprolonginghispainfullife.Ifwereallylovetheonewhocommitsuicide,weshouldlethimdieinadesiredway,diewithdignityashewishes.Becausethisiswheretruelovelies.
Judgingfromwhathasbeendiscussedabove,wecansafelydrawtheconclusionthatweshouldmakesuicidelegalized.Becauseit’sanewandbittertruthwemustlearntoface.
That’sall.Thankyou.
Goodmorningeveryone.TodayI’mhappytomakeadiscussionaboutpaperbookandE-bookwithyou.Afterourteamseriouslythinkinganddiscussion,weagreethatpaperbookisstillthefirsts
electionwhenpeopledecidetoread.经过我们团队认真思考和讨论,大家一致认
为,纸书依然是当人们决定要读取的第一个选择。
Thatmeans,thoughE-bookhasappearedformanyyearsanditsmarketisgrowingrapidly,paperbookstilloccupythefirstplace.这意味着,尽管电子图书已经出现了许多
年,其市场正很快,纸质书仍然占据第一的位置。
Therefore,ourgroupchoosetosupportpaperbook.WhencomparedwithE-book,paperbookhasitsnaturaladvantages.因此,我们小组选择支持的纸质书。当与电子书相
比,纸书有其天然的优势。
Firstly,traditionalculturetakepaperbookasitscarrier,thisalsomakestraditionalreadinghasbecomeahabitformostpeople.首先,传统文化采取纸质图书为载体,这也
使得传统阅读对大多数人来说已经成为一种习惯。
Weallknowthatonceahabitdeveloped,itwillbehardtochange.我们都知道,一旦习
惯开发的,这将是很难改变。
ItalsoillustratesthatthestatusofpaperbookisstillhardtoshakebyE-bookandthesoulandessenceofpaperbookarealsoimpossibletobereplacedbyE-book.这也说
明了纸书的地位还是难以通过电子书来动摇灵魂和纸书的精华,也不可能被电子书取代。
Traditionalreadinghelpsuscultivateabstractthinkingability,bycontrast,E-booklookslikeakindoffastfoodculturewhichlacksofdepthandaftertaste.传统的阅读能
帮助我们培养抽象思维能力,相比之下,电子书看起来就像是一种快餐文化,而缺乏深度和回味。
Secondly,E-bookisn’treallyconductivetocollection,collectionofbooksisalsoakindofcollectionofcultureandahistoricalaccumulationatthesametime.其次,电子书是
不是真的利于收藏,收藏的书籍也是一种集文化,并在同一时间一个历史积淀。
So,onedayinthefuture,ifwhatwecanseeinmuseumisnotancientbooksbutelectronicreaders,suchaskindle,CD,removingstoragedevices,don’ttellmethatyoustillhaveinterestingtovisit.于是,有一天,在未来,如果我们能在博物馆看到的是不是古
代的书籍,但电子阅读器,如点燃,CD,删除存储设备,不要告诉我,你还有兴趣访问。
So,asfarasI’mconcerned,aelectronicreaderisalwaysacoldmachine,itcann’tbringuswarmfeelinglikepaperbook.所以,就我而言,一个电子阅读器始终是一个冰冷的机器,
它无法带给我们像纸书温暖的感觉。
Tosumup,wechoosetosupportpaperbookisarightchoice.综上所述,我们选择支持
纸书是一个正确的选择。