最新文章专题视频专题问答1问答10问答100问答1000问答2000关键字专题1关键字专题50关键字专题500关键字专题1500TAG最新视频文章推荐1 推荐3 推荐5 推荐7 推荐9 推荐11 推荐13 推荐15 推荐17 推荐19 推荐21 推荐23 推荐25 推荐27 推荐29 推荐31 推荐33 推荐35 推荐37视频文章20视频文章30视频文章40视频文章50视频文章60 视频文章70视频文章80视频文章90视频文章100视频文章120视频文章140 视频2关键字专题关键字专题tag2tag3文章专题文章专题2文章索引1文章索引2文章索引3文章索引4文章索引5123456789101112131415文章专题3
当前位置: 首页 - 科技 - 知识百科 - 正文

也议MySQL中隐式转换_MySQL

来源:动视网 责编:小采 时间:2020-11-09 19:43:22
文档

也议MySQL中隐式转换_MySQL

也议MySQL中隐式转换_MySQL:1. 环境说明 blog地址:http://blog.csdn.net/hw_libo/article/details/39252427 RHEL 6.4 x86_64 + MySQL 5.6.19 测试表: MySQL [test]> show create table emp\G *************************** 1.
推荐度:
导读也议MySQL中隐式转换_MySQL:1. 环境说明 blog地址:http://blog.csdn.net/hw_libo/article/details/39252427 RHEL 6.4 x86_64 + MySQL 5.6.19 测试表: MySQL [test]> show create table emp\G *************************** 1.


1. 环境说明

blog地址:http://blog.csdn.net/hw_libo/article/details/39252427

RHEL 6.4 x86_64 + MySQL 5.6.19

测试表:

MySQL [test]> show create table emp\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
 Table: emp
Create Table: CREATE TABLE `emp` (
 `EMPNO` int(11) NOT NULL,
 `ENAME` varchar(15) NOT NULL,
 `JOB` varchar(15) NOT NULL,
 `MGR` int(11) DEFAULT '0',
 `HIREDATE` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
 `SAL` int(20) DEFAULT '0',
 `COMM` int(11) DEFAULT '0',
 `DEPTNO` int(11) NOT NULL,
 PRIMARY KEY (`EMPNO`),
 KEY `idx_deptno` (`DEPTNO`),
 KEY `idx_sal` (`SAL`),
 KEY `idx_comm` (`COMM`),
 KEY `idx_ename` (`ENAME`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> select * from emp;
+-------+--------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| EMPNO | ENAME | JOB | MGR | HIREDATE | SAL | COMM | DEPTNO |
+-------+--------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| 7369 | SMITH | CLERK | 7902 | 1980-12-17 00:00:00 | 800 | NULL | 20 |
| 7499 | ALLEN | SALESMAN | 7698 | 1981-02-20 00:00:00 | 1600 | 300 | 30 |
| 7521 | WARD | SALESMAN | 7698 | 1981-02-22 00:00:00 | 1250 | 500 | 30 |
| 7566 | JONES | MANAGER | 7839 | 1981-04-02 00:00:00 | 2975 | 0 | 20 |
| 7654 | MARTIN | SALESMAN | 7698 | 1981-09-28 00:00:00 | 1250 | 1400 | 30 |
| 7698 | BLAKE | MANAGER | 7839 | 1981-05-01 00:00:00 | 2850 | 0 | 30 |
| 7782 | CLARK | MANAGER | 7839 | 1981-06-09 00:00:00 | 2450 | 0 | 10 |
| 7788 | SCOTT | ANALYST | 7566 | 1987-04-19 00:00:00 | 3000 | NULL | 20 |
| 7839 | KING | PRESIDENT | 0 | 1981-11-17 00:00:00 | 5000 | 0 | 10 |
| 7844 | TURNER | SALESMAN | 7698 | 1981-09-08 00:00:00 | 1500 | 0 | 30 |
| 7876 | ADAMS | CLERK | 7788 | 1987-05-23 00:00:00 | 1100 | 0 | 20 |
| 7900 | JAMES | CLERK | 7698 | 1981-12-03 00:00:00 | 950 | 0 | 30 |
| 7902 | FORD | ANALYST | 7566 | 1981-12-03 00:00:00 | 3000 | 0 | 20 |
| 7934 | MILLER | CLERK | 7782 | 1982-01-23 00:00:00 | 1300 | 0 | 10 |
| 7936 | 23456 | BOSCO-DBA | 7788 | 2014-09-13 16:13:56 | 2450 | 800 | 10 |
+-------+--------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
15 rows in set (0.00 sec)

2. 数值类型(int)

首先提个问题,如上测试表emp中empno是主键,类型为int,那么:

select * from emp where empno='7788';

会产生隐式转换吗?

下面实验证明:

MySQL [test]> select * from emp where empno=7788;
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| EMPNO | ENAME | JOB | MGR | HIREDATE | SAL | COMM | DEPTNO |
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| 7788 | SCOTT | ANALYST | 7566 | 1987-04-19 00:00:00 | 3000 | NULL | 20 |
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

MySQL [test]> explain select * from emp where empno=7788;
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | emp | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | NULL |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

MySQL [test]> select * from emp where empno='7788';
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| EMPNO | ENAME | JOB | MGR | HIREDATE | SAL | COMM | DEPTNO |
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| 7788 | SCOTT | ANALYST | 7566 | 1987-04-19 00:00:00 | 3000 | NULL | 20 |
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

MySQL [test]> explain select * from emp where empno='7788';
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | emp | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | NULL |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
可见,针对数据类型字段,即使类型不一致,并不影响是否使用索引,执行计划是一样的,不会产生隐式转换。但仍然建议在生产库中尽量避免出现这样的SQL。

注意:

数值类型有一种隐式转换,如果以数字开关的,后面的字符将被截断,只取前面的数字值,如果不以数字开关的将被置为0。如下:

MySQL [test]> select * from emp where empno='7788ab12'; ## 这个就相当于empno=7788,后面的ab12将被截断,并且不影响索引的使用
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| EMPNO | ENAME | JOB | MGR | HIREDATE | SAL | COMM | DEPTNO |
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| 7788 | SCOTT | ANALYST | 7566 | 1987-04-19 00:00:00 | 3000 | NULL | 20 |
+-------+-------+---------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

MySQL [test]> show warnings;
+---------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| Level | Code | Message |
+---------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| Warning | 1292 | Truncated incorrect DOUBLE value: '7788ab12' |
+---------+------+----------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

MySQL [test]> select * from emp where empno='ab7788'; ## 这个就相当于empno=0
Empty set (0.01 sec)

3. 字符类型(varchar)

同样,针对测试表emp中的ename字段(varchar类型),上面有一辅助索引idx_ename,并且ename中有一个值是全数字的,若有这样的查询:

select * from emp where ename=23456;
上面的SQL会不会出现隐式转换呢?

下面实验证明:

MySQL [test]> select * from emp where ename='23456';
+-------+-------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| EMPNO | ENAME | JOB | MGR | HIREDATE | SAL | COMM | DEPTNO |
+-------+-------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| 7936 | 23456 | BOSCO-DBA | 7788 | 2014-09-13 16:13:56 | 2450 | 800 | 10 |
+-------+-------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

MySQL [test]> explain select * from emp where ename='23456'; ## 正常来说,可以使用到索引idx_ename
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-----------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-----------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | emp | ref | idx_ename | idx_ename | 47 | const | 1 | Using index condition |
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-----------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> select * from emp where ename=23456; ## 当varchar类型不对时,仍然是可以查出结果
+-------+-------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| EMPNO | ENAME | JOB | MGR | HIREDATE | SAL | COMM | DEPTNO |
+-------+-------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
| 7936 | 23456 | BOSCO-DBA | 7788 | 2014-09-13 16:13:56 | 2450 | 800 | 10 |
+-------+-------+-----------+------+---------------------+------+------+--------+
1 row in set, 14 warnings (0.00 sec)

MySQL [test]> explain select * from emp where ename=23456; ## 当varchar类型不匹配时,索引无效了,选择了全表扫描
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | emp | ALL | idx_ename | NULL | NULL | NULL | 15 | Using where |
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

可见,如果是字符类型,当出现类型不一致时,是会影响索引的使用的,会产生隐式转换的。

blog地址:http://blog.csdn.net/hw_libo/article/details/39252427

-- Bosco QQ:375612082

---- END ----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
版权所有,文章允许转载,但必须以链接方式注明源地址,否则追究法律责任!

文档

也议MySQL中隐式转换_MySQL

也议MySQL中隐式转换_MySQL:1. 环境说明 blog地址:http://blog.csdn.net/hw_libo/article/details/39252427 RHEL 6.4 x86_64 + MySQL 5.6.19 测试表: MySQL [test]> show create table emp\G *************************** 1.
推荐度:
标签: 转换 mysql mysql中
  • 热门焦点

最新推荐

猜你喜欢

热门推荐

专题
Top