

我需要一个函数工作,比如远程连接一个端口,远程读取文件等,但是我给的时间有限,比如,4秒钟如果你还没有读取完成或者连接成功,我就不等了,很可能对方已经宕机或者拒绝了。这样可以批量做一些事情而不需要一直等,浪费时间。
结合我的需求,我想到这种办法:
1、在主进程执行,调用一个进程执行函数,然后主进程sleep,等时间到了,就kill 执行函数的进程。
测试一个例子:
import time import threading def p(i): print i class task(threading.Thread): def __init__(self,fun,i): threading.Thread.__init__(self) self.fun = fun self.i = i self.thread_stop = False def run(self): while not self.thread_stop: self.fun(self.i) def stop(self): self.thread_stop = True def test(): thread1 = task(p,2) thread1.start() time.sleep(4) thread1.stop() return if __name__ == '__main__': test()
经过测试只定了4秒钟。
经过我的一番折腾,想到了join函数,这个函数式用来等待一个线程结束的,如果这个函数没有结束的话,那么,就会阻塞当前运行的程序。关键是,这个参数有一个可选参数:join([timeout]): 阻塞当前上下文环境的线程,直到调用此方法的线程终止或到达指定的timeout(可选参数)。
不多说了贴下面代码大家看下:
#!/usr/bin/env python #-*-coding:utf-8-*- ''''' author:cogbee time:2014-6-13 function:readme ''' import pdb import time import threading import os #pdb.set_trace() class task(threading.Thread): def __init__(self,ip): threading.Thread.__init__(self) self.ip = ip self.thread_stop = False def run(self): while not self.thread_stop: #//添加你要做的事情,如果成功了就设置一下self.thread_stop变量。 [python] view plaincopy在CODE上查看代码片派生到我的代码片 if file != '': self.thread_stop = True def stop(self): self.thread_stop = True def test(eachline): global file list = [] for ip in eachline: thread1 = task(ip) thread1.start() thread1.join(3) if thread1.isAlive(): thread1.stop() continue #将可以读取的都存起来 if file != '': list.append(ip) print list if __name__ == '__main__': eachline = ['1.1.1.1','222.73.5.54'] test(eachline)
下面给大家分享我写的一段杀死线程的代码。
由于python线程没有提供abort方法,分享下面一段代码杀死线程:
import threading
import inspect
import ctypes
def _async_raise(tid, exctype):
"""raises the exception, performs cleanup if needed"""
if not inspect.isclass(exctype):
raise TypeError("Only types can be raised (not instances)")
res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, ctypes.py_object(exctype))
if res == 0:
raise ValueError("invalid thread id")
elif res != 1:
# """if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble,
# and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"""
ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, 0)
raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")
class Thread(threading.Thread):
def _get_my_tid(self):
"""determines this (self's) thread id"""
if not self.isAlive():
raise threading.ThreadError("the thread is not active")
# do we have it cached?
if hasattr(self, "_thread_id"):
return self._thread_id
# no, look for it in the _active dict
for tid, tobj in threading._active.items():
if tobj is self:
self._thread_id = tid
return tid
raise AssertionError("could not determine the thread's id")
def raise_exc(self, exctype):
"""raises the given exception type in the context of this thread"""
_async_raise(self._get_my_tid(), exctype)
def terminate(self):
"""raises SystemExit in the context of the given thread, which should
cause the thread to exit silently (unless caught)"""
self.raise_exc(SystemExit)使用例子:
>>> import time >>> from thread2 import Thread >>> >>> def f(): ... try: ... while True: ... time.sleep(0.1) ... finally: ... print "outta here" ... >>> t = Thread(target = f) >>> t.start() >>> t.isAlive() True >>> t.terminate() >>> t.join() outta here >>> t.isAlive() False
试了一下,很不错,只是在要kill的线程中如果有time.sleep()时,好像工作不正常,没有找出真正的原因是什么。已经是很强大了。哈哈。
